Jul 04, 2010, 10:41 PM // 22:41 | #1 |
Pre-Searing Cadet
Join Date: Jul 2010
|
weapon requirements
i notice that next to some weapons it says requires___ _______ (ex. requires 9 tactics) But i find that i can still wield those weaons. Is their a consequence to not having that requirement? Also in auctions and stuff it says the weapon and then R11 or R9 or something. What does that mean?
|
Jul 04, 2010, 11:00 PM // 23:00 | #2 |
Administrator
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
If you don't meet the requirement, the thing listed before it won't do what it says. For example if you have a sword that says 'Slashing Dmg: 15-22 (requires 12 Swordsmanship)' and you've only got 10 Swordsmanship, the sword will act as if the damage range was 2-3 (the same range as a starter sword).
R11, R9, etc are the requirement.
__________________
|
Jul 04, 2010, 11:07 PM // 23:07 | #3 |
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
R11 or R9 means the weapon has a requirement of 11 or 9.
If you fulfill the requirement the weapon/shield will deal the listed damage/give the listed armor bonus, if not you will get only get a fixed amount. I.e. if you don't fullflil the requirement of a shield you'll get only 8 armor, axes will deal only 6-12 damage etc. Keep in mind that once your weapon mastery is at least one point higher than the requirement the requirement doesn't matter anymore, i.e. if you have 14 points in Axe Mastery it doesn't matter if your axe has an req of 13, 12, 11, 10, 9 or 8. Weakness (a condition) can lower all your attributes by one point, so having a req 14 weapon would make a great difference in the previous scenario because you would no longer fullfil the req and your damage would decrease greatly. edit: Afaik if you don't fulfill the req most weapons will will be as good as the best version of the weapon type that exisist without a requirement, which would be 8-10 damage for a sword. Last edited by Desert Rose; Jul 04, 2010 at 11:15 PM // 23:15.. |
Jul 04, 2010, 11:18 PM // 23:18 | #4 | ||
Administrator
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
||
Jul 05, 2010, 01:16 PM // 13:16 | #5 |
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Guild Hall
Profession: R/
|
Marty & Desert, here's the deal:
When not meeting the requirements of a green weapon it'll act as if it's the starter dmg. Golden weapons on the other hand, become half the dmg they state they do if not meeting the req. |
Jul 05, 2010, 02:01 PM // 14:01 | #6 |
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
It says "similar", not "exactly" like a starter weapon; also, wiki has often been wrong about the exact details of the game mechanics.
I've just tested it Greater Sage Blade, 15-22 damage, req 13 with 12 swordsmanship, I've caused 5-7 damage with 10 damage crits; that's way more than a starter sword (2-3). Sadly I've no other req 13 weapons or non max damage weapons at hand to test further. The second rule is definitely wrong (my single test already disproved it), and I'm would be surprised if the first one is also false. |
Jul 05, 2010, 02:47 PM // 14:47 | #7 |
rattus rattus
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London, UK GMT??0 ??1hr DST
Guild: [GURU]GW [wiki]GW2
Profession: R/
|
Tut, have none of you seen the damage calculators designed by the venerable Charles Ensign?
http://www.guildwarsguru.com/calcula...uru_weapon.php The point that most people don't get is that the stated damage range of a weapon only applies if your stat in the required attribute is 12. For example, if you have a (max damage) req 9 sword and 9 in swordsmanship, you wil be doing 11.57-16.96 damage (rounded up) - not 15-22 as you might expect. If you have 12 in swordsmanship, however, you WILL do 15-22 damage - regardless of whether the weapon's req is 8, 9, 10, 11 or 12! No, I don't know what the point of weapon requirement is. Price inflation, maybe?
__________________
Si non confectus, non reficiat
Last edited by Snograt; Jul 05, 2010 at 03:02 PM // 15:02.. |
Jul 05, 2010, 02:58 PM // 14:58 | #8 | |
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Quote:
|
|
Jul 05, 2010, 03:04 PM // 15:04 | #9 |
rattus rattus
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London, UK GMT??0 ??1hr DST
Guild: [GURU]GW [wiki]GW2
Profession: R/
|
Yes, that's true - I thought it would be a good idea to quash some mis-conceptions while we were on the subject.
__________________
Si non confectus, non reficiat
|
Jul 05, 2010, 03:42 PM // 15:42 | #10 | |
Hell's Protector
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Canada
Guild: Brothers Disgruntled
|
Quote:
As has been said, the requirement only affects the stat that it is listed next to. If, for example, you have a Vampiric Sword of Fortitude, with an energy+5 inscription, the requirement will only affect the base damage of the sword. Even if you don't meet the requirement - even if you are not even a warrior - you will still get the Vampiric life steal, the health bonus from the Fortitude, and the +5 energy from the inscription. So, basically, depending upon what you want from a weapon, the requirement doesn't matter much in many cases. Which is why you see crazy stuff like Assassins wielding scythes and Monks with spears, etc. (Not a good thing imho) |
|
Jul 07, 2010, 12:25 AM // 00:25 | #11 | |
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: drifting between Indiana and NorCal
|
Quote:
Much more useful than a staff imo. |
|
Jul 07, 2010, 02:19 PM // 14:19 | #12 |
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: UK
|
|
Jul 07, 2010, 03:49 PM // 15:49 | #13 | ||
Forge Runner
Join Date: Mar 2006
Profession: N/
|
Quote:
even still, not sure if +armour is really all that useful on a general purpose caster weaponset when you have the likes of sy and other imba defenses. |
||
Jul 07, 2010, 07:11 PM // 19:11 | #14 | |
Hell's Protector
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Canada
Guild: Brothers Disgruntled
|
Quote:
And, I agree that the +armour is not all that useful in PvE. It would be better to have more energy or HCT. But, spear and shield is "leet" (except on a Paragon, of course.) Last edited by Quaker; Jul 07, 2010 at 07:16 PM // 19:16.. |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:45 AM // 04:45.
|